Compare like with like
Equity benchmarks use the equity portion's cash flows and dates. The overall portfolio is kept separate when an equity index would be an inappropriate comparison.
← All work
EnableFolio
A portfolio report that explains the portfolio.
Turn transaction history and market data into a clear account of performance, concentration and risk.
Wealth and advisory teams
The sample is anonymised and scaled. It demonstrates reporting technology, not EnableWealth investment performance or investment advice.
The question behind the work.
A transaction statement shows what an investor owns. A useful review also needs to explain the experience of owning it: the effect of cash flows, the shape of the portfolio and how it behaved when markets fell.
How we approached it.
We built a deterministic calculation pipeline using transaction histories, fund NAVs and index data. No AI: explicit methodology governs the calculations and comparisons, reducing discretion in how the portfolio is assessed. Data limitations are recorded alongside the output.
The decisions that matter.
Show where risk sits
Scheme, category and fund-house concentration sit alongside drawdown and capture measures, so a return figure has context.
Make uncertainty visible
Incomplete transaction histories, mapping issues and comparison coverage are disclosed. Missing comparisons are not filled with invented precision.
What the work made possible.
An investor-friendly report that brings portfolio structure, money-weighted returns, fund comparisons and downside behaviour into one review, with the methodology and its limitations made explicit.
Discuss a similar challenge →